A admissibilidade da carta psicografada como meio de prova no Tribunal do Júri.

Abstract

The present conclusion work focuses on the analysis of the admissibility of psychographed letters as a means of proof in the trials of crimes related to life, as well as their origin and repercussion in the Brazilian criminal legal scenario and thus aims to analyze the possibility of using these letters as a means of admissible evidence in the Jury Court and how they can positively , or not, influence the decision made by the natural jurors of the cause. In the same line of thought, the following question is asked: Although the State determines itself "secular", the use of the psychographed letter as a means of proof in the jury court session would be an element to be weighed for the decision of the jurors, regardless of particular creed. From this perspective, considering that judges would use their intimate conviction to decide on the trial of crimes against life, would it be a admissible and recognized means of proof to convict or acquit a defendant? The method of approach used for the present work is the deductive, based on doctrinal and documentary exploration, as well as jurisprudential analysis. It is of fundamental importance to study the subject, since the legislation does not prohibit the use of psychographed letters as a means of proof, if of lawful origin, and their use would bring a more differentiated view to the judges and these would have greater evidential elements to be considered when making their decision, if they so mean.