Discussões jurisprudenciais acerca de temas processuais no juizado especial cível estadual.

Abstract

This monographic work was designed with a focus on analyzing the consequences of jurisprudential understandings in the procedures of Special State Civil Courts. Special Courts play a fundamental role in resolving less complex cases, as speed and simplicity prevail. As jurisprudence plays a fundamental role in guiding procedures, it can have significant repercussions. So the problem lies in what are the legal consequences due to procedural jurisprudential understandings for the procedures of Special State Civil Courts? It will be through exploratory research, whose purpose will be to analyze and systematize jurisprudential discussions related to procedural themes in the context of the Special Civil Court. The research will be developed using a hypothetical-deductive method. In the construction of hypotheses about the gaps that exist in the court procedures, which brings about the need to verify jurisprudential understandings. Data will be collected through bibliographical researchand access to jurisprudential systems, especially from the Appeal Panels, a Second Degree body within the courts. Once the chapters have been briefly discussed, the results obtained show the crucial and essential role of jurisprudential understandings in defining court procedures, influencing their predictability, accessibility, and speed, since these jurisprudences contribute to the construction of a legal system for serving the less favored sections of the population with an agile, simple and economical process.