http://hdl.handle.net/11624/165 2026-08-16T12:10:49Z 2026-08-16T12:10:49Z Veiga, Mariane dos Santos Soares http://hdl.handle.net/11624/4325 2026-08-14T14:51:26Z 2026-01-01T00:00:00Z

Title: A Lei Maria da Penha sob a perspectiva da efetividade : instrumento de combate à violência de gênero no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro. Authors: Veiga, Mariane dos Santos Soares Abstract: This paper analyzes Law No. 11,340/2006 (Maria da Penha Law) from the perspective of its effectiveness in addressing domestic and family violence against women in Brazil. The research seeks to understand how the legislation contributes to the protection of women in situations of violence, as well as to identify the main challenges that still hinder the full application of its protection mechanisms. Even though the Maria da Penha Law, also known as Law No. 1,340/2006, is a major milestone in the fight against domestic violence against women, there are still challenges and problems to be discussed. In this scenario, it becomes essential to analyze the efficiency of the law and reflect on whether, beyond the letter of the law, it has managed to play a transformative role in the cycle of violence in women's lives. In light of this, the question is: Despite the advances provided by the Maria da Penha Law (Law No. 11,340/2006), to what extent has its application been effective in reducing the rates of domestic and family violence against women in Brazil? The methodology used is based on bibliographic research, with analysis of doctrine, scientific articles, and statistical data on gender violence, allowing for a qualitative approach to the topic. The study also examines the main forms of violence foreseen in the legislation, the cycle of domestic violence, and the social and structural factors that contribute to the victim remaining in abusive relationships. The results demonstrate that, despite the significant advances brought about by the Maria da Penha Law, there are still obstacles related to the effectiveness of protective measures, the institutional structure, and the patriarchal culture rooted in Brazilian society. It is concluded that the law represents an important legal and social milestone, but its full effectiveness depends on integrated public policies, efficient state action, and cultural transformation in the fight against gender violence.

2026-01-01T00:00:00Z Silva, Milena Oliveira da http://hdl.handle.net/11624/4324 2026-08-13T14:30:17Z 2026-01-01T00:00:00Z

Title: A lacuna normativa na Lei de Drogas e a insegurança jurídica na distinção entre uso pessoal e tráfico ilícito. Authors: Silva, Milena Oliveira da Abstract: This monograph aims to analyze the normative gap within Brazilian Law nº 11.343/2006, particularly regarding the absence of objective criteria for distinguishing drug users from drug traffickers, and its impacts on the application of criminal law. The research is based on the problem of how this normative indeterminacy compromises legal certainty and influences judicial decision-making in classifying such conduct. To this end, the study adopts a deductive method, with a qualitative approach, based on bibliographic and documentary research, supported by specialized legal doctrine, legislation, and jurisprudence from higher courts. Initially, the historical evolution of drug policy in Brazil is examined, highlighting the consolidation of a predominantly repressive model. Subsequently, the legal provisions of the Drug Law are analyzed, emphasizing the lack of objective parameters and the resulting expansion of judicial discretion. The study then addresses the distinction between personal use and drug trafficking, demonstrating the insufficiency of current criteria, especially in light of empirical data on consumption patterns. It is also worth highlighting the analysis of recent case law from the Supreme Federal Court and the Superior Court of Justice, which has contributed to the development of more objective interpretative parameters. Finally, it is concluded that the absence of clear normative criteria generates legal uncertainty, allows unequal interpretations, and reinforces penal selectivity, indicating the need for legislative revision aimed at establishing objective and proportionate standards consistent with constitutional principles.

2026-01-01T00:00:00Z Borges, Letícia da Rosa http://hdl.handle.net/11624/4323 2026-08-13T13:48:57Z 2026-01-01T00:00:00Z

Title: Condições e possibilidades da inteligência artificial auxiliar na tomada de decisões judiciais. Authors: Borges, Letícia da Rosa Abstract: This monograph focuses on the analysis of the technical and legal conditions for the use of Artificial Intelligence as a tool to support judicial decision-making, from a multidisciplinary approach that considers technological advances and their impacts on the Judiciary. The research begins with an examination of the structure of judicial decisions, moves on to the debate about the use of these systems in the elaboration of decisions, and finally investigates the possible liability of magistrates and others involved in the development and application of Artificial Intelligence in cases of damages resulting from its use. The general objective of the study is to examine the impacts and consequences of the use of Artificial Intelligence as an auxiliary instrument in the pronouncement of judicial decisions. Specific objectives include analyzing the current stage of development of these technologies in the Brazilian Judiciary, understanding the criteria necessary for their application in a manner compatible with fundamental rights, identifying their limitations, and discussing the forms of civil liability arising from any damages caused to those under the jurisdiction of the courts. To achieve these objectives, the hypothetical-deductive method is adopted, starting from the formulation of hypotheses about the legal impacts of Artificial Intelligence, which are analyzed throughout the study. The central hypothesis argues that the use of Artificial Intelligence can contribute to strengthening the justice system, provided that its application is guided by constitutional principles, ensures human control, and provides adequate accountability mechanisms. The relevance of the topic is justified by the increasing technological advancement and the incorporation of these tools in the legal field, which demands a critical analysis of its benefits and challenges. In this context, the study seeks to understand the role of Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary, both as an instrument to support jurisdictional activity and, potentially, as an element with a greater degree of influence in the decision-making process. Thus, the work intends to question and understand the possible developments of the use of Artificial Intelligence in Law, highlighting the importance of its balanced use that promotes efficiency and speed without compromising the justice and legitimacy of judicial decisions.

2026-01-01T00:00:00Z Pereira, Dierly http://hdl.handle.net/11624/4313 2026-08-06T15:00:06Z 2026-01-01T00:00:00Z

Title: A litigância predatória no sistema processual brasileiro e em especial no Tribunal de Justiça do Rio Grande do Sul. Authors: Pereira, Dierly Abstract: This paper analyzes the misuse of the right to legal action from the perspective of predatory litigation, investigating its theoretical foundations, repercussions in the Court of Justice of Rio Grande do Sul (TJRS), and mitigation strategies. The central problem lies in the intensification of this phenomenon in the Brazilian legal landscape, where the distortion of constitutional guarantees to obtain illicit advantages overburdens the Judiciary and compromises jurisdictional speed. Despite initiatives by the National Council of Justice (CNJ), such as the Intelligence Centers and NUMO-PEDE, a gap is identified in the integration of data between different courts, which hinders the tracking of interstate abusive conduct. The general objective is to propose the implementation of a technological extension, linked to the Google system, for the monitoring and integration of data within the TJRS, aiming to increase the effectiveness in combating these practices. Methodologically, the research seeks to distinguish mass litigation from predatory litigation, based on the principles of procedural good faith and cooperation. The justification is based on the social relevance of the topic, given that the artificial multiplication of lawsuits hinders access to justice and the reasonable duration of proceedings. It concludes that innovative and unified technological solutions are needed, capable of promoting the early detection of abusive patterns and supporting public and oversight policies within the national justice system.

2026-01-01T00:00:00Z